Final answer:
The question contains a mix-up of contexts, incorporating elements from psychology and legal terminology. It references Bandura's Bobo doll study related to observational learning and aggression in children, but it erroneously mentions a 'courtroom' scenario and an objection by someone named 'Briggs,' which is unrelated to the psychological study.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to be confused about two different subjects. The name 'Briggs' does not clearly relate to any widespread objections in legal or psychological contexts. However, when mentioning 'Bobo' and a response to aggressive models, this suggests the question regards Bandura's Bobo doll study, an important experiment in psychology that demonstrated observational learning and aggression.
In Bandura's study, when the children observed an aggressive model interacting with the Bobo doll, they were more likely to imitate those aggressive behaviors when they were later placed in a room with the doll and other toys. This effect was particularly noted when the model was of the same sex as the child or was an adult. This study is often referenced in discussions around media violence and children's behavior. It does not, however, relate to any courtroom scenario or legal proceedings regarding an objection named Briggs.