Final answer:
Historically, religious, social structures, and laws have shaped the tendency of commoners to support the luxuries of the elite. Cultural attitudes, such as isolationism, and power wielded by authorities often dictated societal compliance. The pursuit of seclusion by individuals was a means of resisting assigned societal roles.
Step-by-step explanation:
The enigma of why common people tolerated living under harsh conditions while propelling the luxurious lifestyles of the elite is a historic puzzle that has been pondered for centuries. Throughout history, various structures of power, whether through religious dictates, social hierarchies, or imperial laws, have compelled individuals to accept and support the social order. For example, religious identity has historically been a compelling force, not only providing inspiration but also fueling divisions and conflicts, as observed in the intolerance and violence between differing religious factions. Additionally, the sense of duty, fear of repercussions, and the urge to maintain order within society have all played roles in why people toiled under oppressive systems. The phenomenon of isolationism in places like ancient China, where superstition and political decisions led to an abrupt halt in maritime exploration, also showcases how, at times, broader cultural attitudes and the mandates of the few in power can greatly influence the lives and fates of the many.
Isolationism, class structures, and religious authority are crucial aspects when considering the motivations behind historical societal compliance and resistance. The way these factors have shaped societies and the decisions of people, either compelling them towards advancement or resigning them to their fate, are significant themes that recur across different epochs and civilizations. Within this context, individuals might seek seclusion or simplicity as an escape or as an act of resistance against the societal roles and fates assigned to them by those in authority.