20.1k views
1 vote
The author presents two more arguments in favor of large republics being able to control factions. Explain them.

User Chaoz
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

James Madison in Federalist No. 10 states that large republics are better at controlling factions because a wide variety of interests makes it harder for any one faction to dominate, and a larger republic is more likely to have enlightened representatives advocating for the general good.

Step-by-step explanation:

The author, James Madison, presents several arguments in support of large republics in controlling factions within Federalist No. 10. The first argument states that a larger republic can prevent local interests from becoming too dominant, as the variety of interests in a broad nation balances each other out. The other key arguments include:

  • Representation: A larger republic will have a broader and more enlightened group of representatives. These representatives can look beyond local prejudices and advocate for justice and the general good.
  • Diversity of Parties: With more varied and numerous parties and interests, it is less likely that any single group can unify to oppress others. This diversity creates a protection against the tyranny of the majority.
  • Republican Government as a Check: A republican government, with its system of representation, is believed to be a guard against the tyranny that can occur in smaller democracies where factions may more easily unite for oppressive purposes.

Madison argues that the varied and numerous interests in a large republic, such as the United States, make it difficult for factions to form a majority strong enough to oppress minority interests, thus safeguarding individual rights and limiting the potential for governmental abuse.

User Zeusox
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.