Final answer:
Kyle's belief in strict adherence to rules and his view that lying is wrong because his father says so suggest Piaget would categorize his morality as conventional. This level is marked by conformity to rules and authority, rather than personal moral principles or societal consensus.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering Kyle's emphasis on adherence to rules set by authority figures like his father, and his belief that lying to parents or teachers is inherently wrong, Piaget would likely categorize Kyle's moral reasoning as reflecting a conventional level of morality. This stage is characterized by an acceptance of rules and norms provided by external sources like parents and society. Kyle's moral judgments are based on the rules and the authority that enforces them, rather than on personal moral principles or a recognition of the societal consensus that might underlie these rules. In contrast to the preconventional stage where moral reasoning is guided by direct consequences to oneself, and the postconventional stage where abstract reasoning is used to think beyond established norms, the conventional level is defined by conformity to rules and social order
According to Piaget, at the conventional level, individuals have not yet reached the cognitive maturity to question the legitimacy of such rules or to weigh them against abstract moral principles, something typically seen in the postconventional stage. Furthermore, it's important to note that moral reasoning, as proposed by Kohlberg, is an evolution from preconventional to conventional and ultimately perhaps to postconventional, though not everyone reaches this final stage.