Final answer:
A successful agreement at the Round Table Conference could have led to earlier self-rule for India and potentially lessened the conflicts between British rulers and Indian nationalists. The actual historical outcome, marked by problems of perception and unfulfilled promises, intensified the Indian independence movement.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Indians had been able to reach an agreement at the Round Table Conference, the course of their struggle for independence could have taken a different turn. Negotiations could have led to an earlier granting of self-rule and reduced the intensity of the conflict between the British and Indian nationalists. The Round Table Conferences were a series of peace talks that aimed at discussing constitutional reforms and a path to Indian autonomy. The hypothetical successful outcome of these talks might have allowed Indian leaders to gradually gain more control over domestic affairs, reducing the reliance on British bureaucrats.
Problems of perception and distrust, however, marred these conferences historically. Indian leaders and the British government had differing expectations regarding Indian representation, rights, and the timing of independence. Often, there was a reluctance on the part of the British to fully commit to the promises made. On the Indian side, unity was difficult to achieve with a diverse range of voices and political positions. The disappointments from such meetings led to intensified movements for complete independence from British rule.
The consequences of a successful agreement could have included an avoidance of the numerous hardships and conflicts, like the ones resulting from the Problems of Perception. It might have led to a more peaceful and progressive path to independence if both sides had come to a mutually satisfying and fully implemented accord.