Final answer:
The term 'destruction of evidence' refers to the act of destroying evidence. If police conduct an illegal search or seizure that leads to evidence collection, such evidence may become inadmissible in court under the exclusionary rule, as established by Mapp v. Ohio.
Step-by-step explanation:
The term that refers to the destruction of evidence is destruction of evidence. In situations where law enforcement conducts a search or seizure, the legality and reasonableness of such actions are often subject to litigation and can affect the admissibility of the collected evidence. As established in the case Mapp v. Ohio, an illegal search or seizure without a warrant, or one that does not fall under certain exceptions, may result in the collected evidence being inadmissible in court due to the exclusionary rule. This rule prevents evidence obtained illegally from being used in a state criminal trial, and also extends to any evidence developed as a consequence of the illegal action.