Final answer:
The FALSE statement is that low face validity can increase the reliability of a study. While validity is connected to how well a study measures what it is designed to measure, reliability refers to the consistency of the results. Low face validity does not imply an increase in study reliability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement about the implications of low face validity that is FALSE is: Low face validity can increase the reliability of a study. Face validity refers to the extent to which a test appears to measure what it's supposed to measure on the surface. It is not an indicator of how consistent the results are, which is what reliability refers to. Therefore, low face validity does not have a direct impact on increasing a study's reliability.
Low face validity can affect the perceived credibility of a study, leading to decreased participant motivation and potentially affecting the honesty of responses. This in turn might jeopardize the accuracy of research findings and challenge the generalizability of the results. However, it's important to note that while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. A measurement can consistently produce the same result (reliable) but still not measure what it's intended to (valid).