Final answer:
Anita Harris criticizes the global economy's use of feminist rhetoric to promote the idea that women should be flexible workers, often resulting in underpaid and undervalued positions, reflecting the evolving but persistent challenges of workforce stratification and gender roles.
Step-by-step explanation:
Anita Harris's exploration of how a global economy uses feminist rhetoric to urge girls to be flexible workers touches upon the intricate relationship between gender dynamics and labor in the context of economic globalization. The notion of 'Jobs for the Girls' often encompasses the idea that while women have gained greater access to the workforce, this inclusion is frequently on terms that stress adaptability and often result in positions that are undervalued and underpaid. These circumstances are embedded within larger sociological and economic discussions around workforce stratification, the developmental impacts of societal roles, and the various theories that frame our understanding of global inequality, such as functionalist, conflict, and symbolic interactionist perspectives.
The historical context shows that women's employment, which was once considered as temporary or unnatural, has evolved over time. Yet, the legacies of those views impact how women's labor is valued and the types of jobs that are considered appropriate for them. The case of female factory workers in China and discussions around American women returning to domesticity post-war are examples of these evolving gender work dynamics. Modern economic forces such as outsourcing and automation further complicate these dynamics, influencing the job opportunities available to women in the United States and worldwide.