Final answer:
Berkeley would dispute the assertion that matter is composed of atoms, as his idealistic philosophy posits that only ideas or perceptions, upheld by God, truly exist. so, option a is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Berkeley would disagree with the claim that matter is made of atoms. He espoused a form of idealism, where only spiritual substance exists and matter, as a concept autonomous from perception, does not. To Berkeley, physical objects do not exist outside of our perception of them; they are collections of ideas or sensations in the minds of perceivers, actively maintained by God. Therefore, the assertion that matter is intrinsically composed of atoms would be contrary to Berkeley's philosophy, which holds that all perceived physicality is directly linked to and dependent upon being conceived by the mind, ultimately the divine mind of God.
Bishop Berkeley would disagree with the claim that matter is made of atoms.
In Berkeley's philosophy of idealism, he argued that the physical world and objects are actually ideas within the mind of God. According to Berkeley, everything that exists is perceived by the mind. Therefore, he would reject the notion that matter is made up of physical atoms, as this implies an external reality independent of human perception.