122k views
5 votes
Which of the following is NOT a method for reconstructing a phylogenetic tree?

a) Bootstrapping
b) Parsimony
c) Bayesian methods
d) Neighbor-joining

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Bootstrapping is not a method for reconstructing a phylogenetic tree; it is used to assess the reliability of the trees. Methods for tree reconstruction include parsimony, Bayesian methods, and neighbor-joining, which are all based on grouping organisms into clades.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct option for the method that is NOT used for reconstructing a phylogenetic tree is a) Bootstrapping. Bootstrapping is a statistical method used to assess the reliability of the inferred phylogenetic trees but it is not a method for the initial reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. The other options mentioned are indeed methods used for reconstructing phylogenetic trees:

  • b) Parsimony is a method that favors the simplest explanation with the least number of evolutionary changes.
  • c) Bayesian methods use probabilities and prior information to infer phylogeny.
  • d) Neighbor-joining is a distance-based method that identifies the pairs of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with the shortest distances to construct a tree.

To define phylogenetic relationships, we can refer to the relative times in the past that species shared common ancestors (d). This reflects the history of divergence and common ancestry among groups of organisms.

Building phylogenetic trees involves methods like cladistics, which groups organisms into clades that include an ancestral species and all its descendants. Clades are monophyletic, meaning that they consist of the ancestor species and all its descendants and are often identified using shared derived characteristics that set them apart from other groups.

User Atsyplenkov
by
7.7k points