Final answer:
The question deals with properties of sets in set theory whether certain operations involving sets A, B, and F imply that A equals B. Equality in products or combinations does not necessarily imply that A equals B, as factors like an empty set F or additional elements combined with F could affect the outcome.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks whether the equality of certain products or combinations of sets A, B, and F implies that A equals B. This is a question related to set theory and the algebraic properties of sets. Set theory is a fundamental part of modern mathematics, and understanding the properties and operations involving sets is crucial for exploring more complex mathematical concepts.
(a) If A × F = B × F, we cannot necessarily conclude A = B. The reason is that F could be an empty set, making A × F and B × F both empty regardless of whether A and B are equal or not.
(b) If A F∪ F, which seems to mean A combined with F equals B combined with F, then it also does not imply A = B. One set could contain elements not present in the other, but when each is combined with F, the resulting sets are equal.
(c) If FÅ = BF, where I presume Å implies some operation involving F, without further context it's difficult to say definitively whether A equals B. Different operations could lead to different conclusions; we need more information about the operation and the sets in question.