Question

Gettier argues that justified true belief is not necessary for knowledge?

Answer 1

Gettier argues that justified true belief is not necessary for knowledge and provides counterexamples to Plato's traditional account of knowledge.

Step-by-step explanation:

Edmund Gettier argued that justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge, which challenges Plato's traditional account of knowledge as justified true belief (JTB). Gettier presented counterexamples, known as Gettier cases, where a person has a justified true belief but does not seem to have knowledge. These cases demonstrate that belief, truth, and justification are necessary but not sufficient conditions for knowledge. To solve the Gettier problem, some philosophers propose adding a fourth condition to JTB or replacing the justification condition with a more robust criteria.