Final answer:
Direct democracy can lead to ill-informed decisions as it relies on voters to make complex policy decisions, potentially causing slow decision-making and a risk of majority tyranny if the electorate is not fully informed.
Step-by-step explanation:
A disadvantage of Direct Democracy is that voters may not be experts, which can result in ill-informed decisions affecting the governance of a society. Direct democracy demands that citizens directly participate in making governmental decisions by voting on issues such as laws and policies rather than through elected representatives. While this system offers the opportunity for citizen engagement, it also assumes that all voters have the time, resources, and expertise to make informed decisions on complex matters. This can be problematic as most citizens might not have the in-depth knowledge necessary to understand all aspects of the issues at hand or the implications of their votes, often leading to the skipping of ballot measures they do not understand or slow decision-making processes.
For example, referendums or initiatives require voters to approve or disapprove of specific legislation, potentially leading to the passing of policy that might not be well-considered if the electorate is not fully informed. Moreover, there may be a risk of majority tyranny, where the majority could make decisions that infringe on the rights of minorities.