Final answer:
The question appears to address static 1-hazards in digital logic design, but the provided reference materials are about chemical and electrical safety hazards. An accurate identification of static 1-hazards would require a digital logic expression or circuit schematic, which was not provided.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to refer to the identification of static 1-hazards, which are a concept in digital logic design, particularly in the study of digital circuits. However, the provided reference materials all relate to chemical, environmental, and electrical safety hazards, such as those indicated by a NFPA hazard diamond or risks associated with electricity like thermal and shock hazards. These references do not directly pertain to static 1-hazards in digital logic circuits, which are scenarios in which a digital circuit could momentarily output the incorrect state (0 instead of 1) during a transition in inputs.
To identify static 1-hazards in a digital logic expression or circuit, one would typically need the Boolean expression or a schematic of the circuit. One then examines potential input transitions to see if there are any conditions under which a temporary 0 could occur when the steady state output should be a 1. This requires an understanding of Boolean algebra and digital circuit design.
Since there seems to be a misunderstanding in the question asked, and we do not have the appropriate information regarding a digital circuit or expression, it is unfeasible to answer the question regarding static 1-hazards without the correct context. For an accurate response, please provide the digital logic expression or the schematic diagram of the circuit in question.