8.4k views
1 vote
Is the return to the investor the cost to the seller?
1) True
2) False

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The return to the investor is not the cost to the seller; it is false. Companies raise funds through IPOs and subsequent sales, but post-IPO trading between investors doesn't affect the company's costs. Returns can be from dividends or capital gains, and a board of directors oversees decision-making in shareholder-owned companies.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that the return to the investor is the cost to the seller is false. When an investor receives a return on investment, this does not necessarily correspond to a cost to the seller. A company, for instance, raises capital through an initial public offering (IPO), and the money from the sale of its stock goes to the company or early-stage investors such as venture capital firms. After an IPO, when stocks are traded among investors, the seller incurs no cost when an investor makes a profit because the transaction occurs between investors on the secondary market.

A company promises a rate of return to its investors, which can be in the form of dividends or capital gains from the appreciation of the stock's value. The decision-making in a company with a large number of shareholders is typically handled by a board of directors elected by the shareholders.

User Rohman HM
by
9.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories