Final answer:
The statements about tastiness and dishonesty are subjective and cannot be tested using the scientific method, while the statements about hummingbird behavior and moon composition can be assessed scientifically.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine the accuracy of the provided statements, we need to assess whether they can be tested using the scientific method, which is a systematic procedure of hypothesizing, observing, and experimenting to confirm or refute a scientific theory.
- Statement 1: "Is macaroni and cheese tastier than broccoli soup?" - This is a subjective question that cannot be objectively measured using the scientific method because 'tasty' is an opinion.
- Statement 2: "Are hummingbirds attracted to the color red?" - This is an objective question that can be tested and investigated using the scientific method.
- Statement 3: "Is the moon made out of green cheese?" - Although the statement is an outdated and incorrect belief, it can, in theory, be tested scientifically by analyzing the composition of moon samples.
- Statement 4: "Is plagiarism dishonest?" - The concept of dishonesty is subjective and thus not testable via scientific method. However, the practice of plagiarism can be measured and approached ethically and legally.
In conclusion, questions that are based on subjective perceptions, like the tastiness of food or personal beliefs about honesty, cannot be tested using the scientific method, whereas questions about physical phenomena or measurable behavior, such as the attraction of hummingbirds to a color or the composition of the moon, can be addressed scientifically.