Final answer:
Neil deGrasse Tyson would likely support a government that promotes science, evidence-based decisions, and public education in scientific matters. He might encourage a balance between governmental and private roles in science, and he emphasizes the importance of scientists contributing to public understanding of science.
Step-by-step explanation:
Neil deGrasse Tyson's opinion on an effective government regarding science is not explicitly detailed in the provided information. However, drawing upon his role as a science communicator and advocate, one may infer that Tyson would likely support a government that actively engages in and promotes scientific endeavors, values evidence-based decision-making, and encourages public understanding and education in science. This can be gleaned from his endeavors to popularize science, much like his inspiration, Carl Sagan, who was both a prolific scientist and a passionate educator of the public on scientific matters. Considering the debate over the role of government in funding entities like NASA versus private sector involvement, Tyson might advocate for a balance between government-initiated science projects and private innovation, highlighting the importance of both to further scientific advancement. It's also clear that Tyson sees value in scientists contributing to the public understanding of science, regardless of whether they have the same eloquence or charisma as he does or as Sagan had. This points toward an effective government fostering collaborations across various sectors to achieve the greatest impact on advancing science and technology. Lastly, Tyson's acknowledgment of the significant impact of government networks in the development of the internet suggests that he likely recognizes the essential role government plays in foundational scientific research and infrastructure that might not be immediately profitable or attractive to private entities.