Answer:
All flowers need water. All trees need water. Therefore, (2) Some flowers are trees.
Explanation:
he given statements establish that both flowers and trees require water. However, it does not imply a unidirectional relationship. While all flowers need water and all trees need water, it doesn't mean that all flowers are trees or vice versa. The statements only assert a shared need for water, leaving room for variability in their individual characteristics.
The logical conclusion is that some trees can indeed be flowers. This accounts for the diversity in plant life where certain types of trees produce flowers. The statements do not preclude the possibility of trees having flowering components, allowing for the coexistence of both features in certain plant species.
Understanding the distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions is essential in logical reasoning. The shared requirement of water is necessary but not a sufficient condition to assert that all flowers are trees.
Option 2 is correct.