110k views
3 votes
Which of the following was a criticism of the idea that the best and brightest citizens would provide the most proper representation in the U.S. democracy?

1) The idea assumes that the best and brightest citizens will always have the best interests of the people in mind.
2) The idea overlooks the fact that intelligence and competence do not necessarily equate to good judgment or moral character.
3) The idea fails to consider the diversity of perspectives and experiences that are necessary for a well-rounded democracy.
4) The idea neglects the importance of equal representation and the voices of all citizens, regardless of their intelligence or abilities.

User Epalm
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Criticism of the notion that only the best and brightest should lead in a democracy includes the risk of undervaluing moral character, overlooking diverse perspectives, and ignoring the need for equal representation.

Step-by-step explanation:

One criticism of the idea that the best and brightest citizens would provide the most proper representation in U.S. democracy is that intelligence and competence do not necessarily equate to good judgment or moral character.

This idea can also overlook the diversity of perspectives and experiences that are necessary for a well-rounded democracy and can neglect the importance of equal representation and the voices of all citizens, regardless of their intelligence or abilities. Moreover, assuming that these individuals will always have the best interests of the people in mind is a significant oversight of the potential for special interests and personal gain to influence decision-making.

User Dorchard
by
7.2k points