Question

How is pseudolistening related to glazing over?

A) Both are active listening techniques.
B) Pseudolistening leads to glazing over.
C) They are unrelated communication phenomena.
D) Glazing over is a subtype of pseudolistening.

Answer 1

Pseudolistening, the act of pretending to listen, can lead to glazing over, which is the non-deliberate drifting of attention from a conversation. While pseudolistening is often intentional, glazing over arises from a lack of concentration or interest.

Step-by-step explanation:

The relationship between pseudolistening and glazing over can be clarified by understanding that pseudolistening is the act of pretending to listen, where someone appears engaged in a conversation but is not actually processing the information being presented. On the other hand, glazing over is typically a non-deliberate drifting of attention where a listener's thoughts become preoccupied, leading to a lack of focus on the conversation at hand. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is:

B) Pseudolistening leads to glazing over.

While pseudolistening can be intentional, a person who is pseudolistening may eventually start glazing over, as both require a lack of genuine engagement in the listening process. However, pseudolistening might be more strategic and deliberate, whereas glazing over is often involuntary and due to a lapse in concentration or interest.