Final answer:
Research shows that transferring juveniles to adult court is associated with an increased likelihood of recidivism and negatively impacts rehabilitation, but does not demonstrate reduced court caseloads. For juveniles, rehabilitation programs are more effective than incarceration.
Step-by-step explanation:
The effects of transferring juveniles to adult court include an increased likelihood of recidivism, negative impact on rehabilitation efforts, and possibly a deterrence effect although this is contentious and evidence suggests it might actually lead to increased delinquency. The one outcome that is not supported by research is reduced court caseloads. Transferring juveniles to adult court does not necessarily reduce the workload of the courts, as each case still requires full processing and may involve additional complexities.
Incarceration for juveniles is particularly problematic, as it has been shown to decrease their human capital by reducing the likelihood of returning to school, hence increasing future crime. Rehabilitation, including drug courts and community service, generally yields more positive outcomes and is more effective in reducing recidivism compared to punitive measures. In contrast to incarceration for adults, which can be effective in certain high-risk cases, for juveniles, alternative approaches including education and economic improvements are favorable in reducing delinquency.