Final Answer:
The given statement "Does Hometown have a legal right to make this threat to Sheila" is False.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hometown Bank cannot legally threaten Sheila with termination for discussing union activity while at her teller window. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees' rights to discuss unionizing and engage in concerted activities for mutual aid and protection, including discussing unions during non-work hours or breaks. Sheila's conversations during her duties as a teller, though at work, still fall under this protection if they pertain to organizing a union among employees. Hometown's threat violates federal labor laws safeguarding employees' rights to unionize and discuss related matters without fear of retaliation.
The NLRA protects employees engaging in concerted activities for mutual aid or protection, ensuring their rights to discuss unionizing, even within work premises during non-work times. Sheila's conversations during her teller duties are also safeguarded under this act, allowing discussions related to unionizing, regardless of her location within the bank. Hometown Bank's threat violates the NLRA, which prohibits employers from penalizing employees for discussing or organizing unions during non-work times or locations.
The NLRA explicitly protects employees' rights to discuss unionizing during non-work hours or breaks, ensuring their freedom from employer interference or retaliation. Sheila's discussions about union activity, even while performing her teller duties, are protected under this act, disallowing Hometown Bank from threatening termination based on these conversations. Thus, Hometown's threat to terminate Sheila for discussing unions during her teller duties violates federal labor laws that safeguard employees' rights to unionize and engage in such discussions.