Final answer:
The term for implementing a new protocol to prevent site infection, based on its proven effectiveness, is evidence-based practice. Inductive reasoning may have contributed to developing the new protocol but refers to the process of drawing conclusions from observations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The best term to describe the action of implementing a new central line care protocol to prevent site infection is evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice incorporates the best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient values when making decisions about the care of patients. It typically involves researching, analyzing, and updating practices to ensure the most effective and efficient care is provided. In the scenario described, significant effectiveness over previous approaches would have been determined through rigorous evaluation and study, leading to the adoption of the new protocol as a standard practice.
Inductive reasoning is a process where conclusions are drawn from observations, which may contribute to the development of new protocols or treatments in healthcare after analyzing a vast amount of evidence. However, it is not the term that describes the actual implementation of evidence into practice. The process of informed consent is about ensuring that research participants are fully knowledgeable about what an experiment entails, but it's not related to the application of protocols in clinical settings.