19.7k views
3 votes
Which Supreme Court ruling asserted that juveniles have the right to be convicted only if there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

A) Miranda v. Arizona
B) In re Gault
C) In re Winship
D) Brown v. Board of Education

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruling that asserted that juveniles have the right to be convicted only if there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt is In re Winship.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court ruling that asserted that juveniles have the right to be convicted only if there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt is In re Winship.

In this case, the Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the state to prove every element of a criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt, including the guilt of the accused juvenile. This ruling ensures that juveniles are afforded the same level of protection as adults in criminal proceedings.

User Aleksandr Pakhomov
by
8.2k points