Question

Briefly explain how the relationship between the national government and state governments operated under the Supreme Court's ""dual federalism"" interpretation. What factors led to the evolution of federalism away from this interpretation?

a) Dual federalism emphasized clear and distinct powers between the national and state governments, limiting federal intervention. Factors leading to its evolution included economic and social changes, necessitating increased federal involvement.

b) Dual federalism promoted a strict separation of powers, allowing states autonomy. The shift away was influenced by challenges such as the Great Depression, prompting a need for national intervention and cooperation.

c) Dual federalism supported a cooperative yet clearly defined relationship between national and state governments. The move away was triggered by wars and economic crises, requiring a more centralized response for effective governance.

d) Dual federalism advocated for shared responsibilities, minimizing federal intrusion. Evolving factors included civil rights movements, pushing for federal action to address inequalities and protect individual rights.

Answer 1

Dual federalism promoted a strict separation of powers, allowing states autonomy. The shift away was influenced by challenges such as the Great Depression, prompting a need for national intervention and cooperation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Dual federalism promoted a strict separation of powers, allowing states autonomy. The shift away was influenced by challenges such as the Great Depression, prompting a need for national intervention and cooperation.