Question

In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, like parolees, probationers were entitled to a two-stage hearing consisting of a preliminary hearing and a final revocation hearing. True or False?

Answer 1

True, the Supreme Court ruling in Gagnon v. Scarpelli granted probationers the same due process rights as parolees, entitling them to a preliminary and a final revocation hearing.

Step-by-step explanation:

The assertion that in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, like parolees, probationers were entitled to a two-stage hearing consisting of a preliminary hearing and a final revocation hearing is True. This decision is reflective of the high court's commitment to ensuring due process rights for individuals within the criminal justice system, particularly for those facing the possibility of revocation of probation or parole. In this Gagnon v. Scarpelli ruling, the Supreme Court extended due process rights to probationers by requiring these two critical stages before probation could be revoked, thereby emphasizing the importance of legal representation and fair hearings.