Final answer:
Probation and parole officers utilize progressive sanctions to address initial resistance or technical violations by offenders, aligning with approaches that prefer proportional responses to the severity of non-compliance rather than immediate incarceration.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is true. Probation and parole officers are indeed able to use in-house progressive sanctions when an offender shows initial signs of resistance or when technical violations first start. The use of these sanctions provides a way to address non-compliant behavior without immediate resort to revocation and re-incarceration, which can be seen as a method of using both negative sanctions and positive sanctions.
Progressive sanctions ensure that responses to breaches in conditions of probation or parole are proportional to the severity of the violation. These may range from a verbal warning for minor infractions to increased supervision, the requirement of attending rehabilitation programs, or eventual revocation for ongoing non-compliance.
This approach echoes the broader principles of the law-and-order movement which has seen shifts in attitudes towards crime and punishment over time, as well as the potential integration of risk assessments and other technology in correctional strategies.