Final Answer:
The case that ruled that evidence seized without probable cause and without a proper search warrant was inadmissible in court is Mapp v. Ohio. the correct option is C. Mapp v. Ohio.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mapp v. Ohio: This landmark case from 1961 held that evidence obtained through illegal searches and seizures, violating the Fourth Amendment, is inadmissible in state courts. The decision extended the exclusionary rule to the states, ensuring that evidence obtained unlawfully cannot be used in criminal prosecutions.
Probable Cause and Search Warrant: Mapp v. Ohio specifically addressed the issue of evidence seized without probable cause and without a proper search warrant. The court emphasized the importance of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Exclusionary Rule: The decision reinforced the exclusionary rule, a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. This rule serves as a deterrent to unlawful searches by making sure that law enforcement follows proper procedures. the correct option is C. Mapp v. Ohio.