Final answer:
False. The legal status of killing a viable fetus varies, depending on jurisdictional definitions of homicide and abortion laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posits a clear assertion: that the killing of a viable fetus by another human being is always homicide. However, the legal status of fetal homicide varies across jurisdictions. In many legal systems, homicide typically involves the unlawful killing of a person who has been born alive, and the term "person" may not universally include a viable fetus. The determination of when life begins and attains legal personhood is a complex and often debated issue, with different societies and legal frameworks holding diverse perspectives.
Moreover, laws regarding abortion further complicate the matter. In some regions, abortion is legal and regulated under specific circumstances, while in others, it may be deemed criminal. The absence of a universally agreed-upon definition of when life begins, combined with differing abortion laws, underscores the complexity of labeling the killing of a viable fetus as homicide in all cases.
Therefore, the assertion that such an act is always homicide is not universally accurate and depends on the legal and cultural context of a given jurisdiction.
In conclusion, the determination of whether the killing of a viable fetus constitutes homicide is contingent on the legal and cultural framework of a specific jurisdiction. The absence of a consistent global perspective on when life begins and the varying laws surrounding abortion highlight the nuanced nature of this issue.