161k views
3 votes
When a plaintiff is suing the auditor for damages under Rule 10(b)-5 of the 1934 Securities Act, which of the following is not part of the plaintiff's burden of proof?

a. The financial statements contained a material, factual misrepresentation or omission.
b. The auditor was negligent.
c. The plaintiff relied on the financial statements.
d. Damages were suffered as a result of reliance on the financial statements.

User Humansg
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

When suing an auditor for damages under Rule 10(b)-5 of the 1934 Securities Act, the plaintiff's burden of proof includes showing material misrepresentation or omission, auditor negligence, reliance on financial statements, and suffered damages.

Step-by-step explanation:

When a plaintiff is suing the auditor for damages under Rule 10(b)-5 of the 1934 Securities Act, the burden of proof includes several factors that the plaintiff needs to establish:

  • The financial statements contained a material, factual misrepresentation or omission. The plaintiff needs to show that the auditor provided false or misleading information in the financial statements.
  • The auditor was negligent. The plaintiff needs to demonstrate that the auditor did not exercise reasonable care or skill when performing their duties.
  • The plaintiff relied on the financial statements. The plaintiff must prove that they relied on the information in the financial statements in making their investment decisions.
  • Damages were suffered as a result of reliance on the financial statements. The plaintiff needs to show that they suffered financial losses due to their reliance on the inaccurate or misleading financial statements.

User Trafalmadorian
by
7.9k points