Final answer:
Disagreement on the value of solitude is developed through the narrator's yearning for personal growth through solitude, contrasted with her husband's practical concerns, and various character experiences and societal views depicting solitude as both peaceful and suspect.
Step-by-step explanation:
Over the course of the text, the idea that people disagree about the value of solitude develops through contrasting desires and experiences. First, the narrator expresses a deep longing for solitude to allow her soul to grow, envisioning a summer spent in nature, observing her garden, and enjoying the peace that silence brings.
Conflict arises with her husband’s pragmatic response about the practicality of such solitude, cautioning her to not dampen her feet, suggesting disagreement or at least a lack of full understanding of her desire.
The narrative then presents various characters who experience and reflect on solitude differently. Some find peace and happiness in solitude, feeling a deep connection with nature; while others experience loneliness or a sense that solitude could be viewed negatively, as either a prison or as something potentially dangerous. Besides, societal perspectives on those who seek solitude might be of suspicion, considering their motives questionable.