129k views
5 votes
Which of the following presents a difference between an EHR and a PHR?

Option 1: Purpose
Option 2: Data ownership
Option 3: Access control
Option 4: Seurity measures

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

An EHR is primarily used by healthcare providers, while a PHR is controlled by individuals to manage their own health information. EHRs are usually owned by healthcare organizations, whereas individuals have ownership over their PHR data. EHRs have stricter access controls and robust security measures, while PHRs may allow individuals to grant access and have varying levels of security.

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference between an EHR (Electronic Health Record) and a PHR (Personal Health Record) can be seen in several aspects:

  1. Purpose: EHRs are primarily used by healthcare providers to store and manage patient health information, while PHRs are controlled by individuals to manage their own health information.
  2. Data ownership: EHRs are usually owned and controlled by healthcare organizations, whereas individuals have ownership and control over their PHR data.
  3. Access control: EHRs often have stricter access controls to ensure privacy and security, while PHRs may allow individuals to grant access to specific healthcare providers or family members.
  4. Security measures: EHRs implement robust security measures to protect sensitive patient information, while PHRs may have varying levels of security measures depending on the platform or application used.
User Harpreet
by
8.5k points