Final answer:
An Individual Grievance Argument (IGAR) is typically considered untimely if filed more than one year after the date of awareness, assuming the policy requires filing within that timeframe.
Step-by-step explanation:
When inquiring whether an Individual Grievance Argument (IGAR) is untimely if the date of awareness is more than one year, it depends on the specific guidelines and time limits set by the agency, institution, or legal body overseeing the grievance process.
Generally, grievances must be filed within a certain time frame from the date of awareness of the issue to be considered timely.
If a policy stipulates that grievances must be submitted within one year of the incident or awareness, then an IGAR filed after that period would be considered untimely. Thus, without a specified context, the answer would be Yes, assuming a standard one-year timeframe applies.
An IGAR (International Guarantee Against Rupture) can be considered untimely if the date of awareness is more than one year. In legal terms, the statute of limitations is a law that sets the maximum time period within which a legal action can be filed. If the date of awareness exceeds the statute of limitations, the IGAR may be considered untimely and the legal action may not be valid.