150k views
2 votes
Cardova was not prohibited from serving as an officer or director of a public company

a. Cardova can serve as an officer or director
b. Cardova is prohibited from serving as an officer or director
c. Cardova's eligibility is unclear
d. Cardova is not involved in public companies

User KacZdr
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final Answer:

Cardova was not prohibited from serving as an officer or director of a public company

a. Cardova can serve as an officer or director

Step-by-step explanation:

Cardova is not prohibited from serving as an officer or director of a public company. This means that Cardova has the eligibility to take on roles as an officer or director in a public company without any restrictions. The absence of a prohibition implies that Cardova has the legal freedom to engage in such positions.

It's important to note that the information provided only addresses Cardova's eligibility and doesn't imply their current involvement or lack thereof in public companies. The statement specifically states the absence of a prohibition, but it doesn't provide information about Cardova's current status or activities.

Thus the correct option is A

User Jackal
by
7.6k points