115k views
1 vote
This case allowed certain searches incident to arrest.

A) Terry v. Ohio
B) Miranda v. Arizona
C) Mapp v. Ohio
D) Chimel v. California

User Melekes
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The case that permitted certain searches incident to arrest is Chimel v. California, permitting officers to search the arrestee and their immediate control area. option d is answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The case that allowed certain searches incident to arrest is D) Chimel v. California. This decision, based on the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, established that the police are permitted to

search the person under arrest and the area within their immediate control without a search warrant, provided the search is incident to a lawful arrest. This principle allows officers to ensure their own safety and to protect evidence from being destroyed.

The Terry v. Ohio case allowed for a stop and frisk based on reasonable suspicion, Miranda v. Arizona set the precedent for police to advise suspects of their rights under the Constitution, and Mapp v. Ohio enforced the exclusionary rule, stating evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in court. option d is answer

User Trystan Sarrade
by
8.7k points