102k views
3 votes
If a court refused to grant a remedy for breach of a contract because it found the contract to be oppressively unfair, the court is employing which of the following doctrines?

A) Doctrine of reasonable reliance.
B) Doctrine of unconscionability.
C) Doctrine of mistake.
D) Doctrine of undue influence.

User MrHopko
by
7.2k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The court is employing the doctrine of unconscionability if it refuses to grant a remedy for breach of a contract because it finds the contract to be oppressively unfair.

Step-by-step explanation:

The court is employing the doctrine of unconscionability if it refuses to grant a remedy for breach of a contract because it finds the contract to be oppressively unfair. The doctrine of unconscionability is a legal principle that recognizes when a contract is so unbalanced and unfair that it should not be enforced. It allows the court to protect one party from being taken advantage of in a contract.

User Nikita Nemkin
by
7.1k points