Final answer:
It is false that the Miranda warnings must be given in the exact language used by the Supreme Court; they must convey specific rights to be effective under the Fifth Amendment. The correct option is b.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that the Miranda warnings must be given in the exact language used by the Supreme Court in the Miranda decision is false. The Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona requires that law enforcement officials must inform suspects of their rights, but it does not mandate a precise script.
The essential elements include notification of the right to remain silent, the fact that any statements can be used against them in court, the right to consult with and have a lawyer present during questioning, the provision of a lawyer if the suspect cannot afford one, and the ability to terminate questioning at any time.
These elements are designed to protect against self-incrimination and to ensure that suspects are aware of their Fifth Amendment rights during custodial interrogation. The exact wording of the Miranda warning can vary as long as the suspect's rights are clearly communicated and understood.
Hence, Option b is correct.