Final answer:
The correct answer is that statements made during the initial attorney conference are both inadmissible in court and subject to attorney-client privilege. Option d is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Statements made during the initial conference with an attorney are subject to the attorney-client privilege. This means such statements are typically inadmissible in court, as they are protected under the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the right to consult legal counsel.
The Miranda decision underscored the right to remain silent and noted that anything one says can be used against one in court, emphasizing the necessity of informing suspects of their rights. However, this is distinct from attorney-client communications, which are meant to be confidential to ensure full and frank disclosure between a defendant and their legal counsel.
The correct answer to the student's question is d) Both b and c, which means that statements are inadmissible in court and are also subject to attorney-client privilege.