Question

Over time, the courts were willing to alter the application of the literal rule in circumstances in which a literal interpretation would produce an:

a. Absurd result
b. Unforeseen consequence
c. Legal loophole
d. Ambiguous outcome

Answer 1

Courts can alter the application of the literal rule to avoid absurd results, demonstrating judicial flexibility. The principle of stare decisis maintains stability but does not prevent adaptability to new contexts.

Step-by-step explanation:

Over time, the courts have been willing to alter the application of the literal rule in circumstances in which a literal interpretation would produce an absurd result. This approach is consistent with the evolving nature of judicial interpretation, as courts aim to apply the Constitution and statutory laws in a manner that reflects contemporary society and its values.

For instance, the principle of stare decisis is important for maintaining legal stability, yet it does not entirely prevent courts from adapting legal interpretations to new circumstances.Supreme Court Decisions like Brown v. Board of Education show how court interpretations can change as times and circumstances change—demonstrating the flexibility within the legal system.