Question

Arbitration in the Miller case compelled both sides to submit reasonable salaries. Why is that?

a) To ensure fairness and equity
b) To reduce costs associated with the arbitration process
c) To expedite the resolution of the dispute
d) To comply with legal regulations

Answer 1

Arbitration in the Miller case required reasonable salary submissions to ensure fairness and equity, aligning with the core principles of the Rule of Law and the purpose of establishing justice through impartial dispute resolution.

Step-by-step explanation:

Arbitration in the Miller case compelled both sides to submit reasonable salaries to ensure fairness and equity. This principle is rooted in the idea of the Rule of Law, which posits that society and its institutions are subject to and accountable to rules fairly applied and enforced.

It is a core responsibility of the government to ensure that laws and resolutions, including those made during arbitration, are equitable.

By requiring reasonable salary submissions, the arbitration process aligns with one of the key purposes of establishing justice, which is to deliver timely and impartial dispute resolution by adequately resourced and neutral decision-makers.

The choice to compel reasonable salaries aims to reflect these values and ensure that the outcome does not exacerbate existing inequalities or make matters worse for the disadvantaged parties.