Final answer:
Dysconscious Audism, implying a subconscious bias against the Deaf community, seems at odds with Deaf culture which promotes pride and tradition within the community. The statement that DA prevents Deaf individuals from expressing cultural pride is likely false, given the context provided about Deaf culture.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of Dysconscious Audism (DA) is not mainstream and does not have a universally recognized or accepted definition. However, the term "audism" is known within the context of Deaf culture and generally refers to discrimination or prejudice against individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. The notion of Dysconscious Audism would presumably refer to a subconscious or unexamined bias against Deaf individuals that may manifest in actions or attitudes that prevent them from expressing their cultural pride.
Based on the concept of Deaf culture as a community with its own language, customs, and values, which includes promoting sign language and other traditional forms of communication, the presumptive definition of DA as something that 'disables Deaf people from expressing Deaf cultural pride' would not align with the ethos of Deaf culture that supports pride in one's identity. Thus, the statement that DA disables Deaf people from expressing Deaf cultural pride is likely to be false.