Final answer:
False
Intent to contract is determined by an objective standard, not a subjective one. The necessary and proper clause expanded the power of the national government, and the Constitutional Convention of 1787 aimed to revise the Articles of Confederation, which resulted in the new Constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that intent to contract is tested by a subjective standard, which asks whether the parties actually intended to form a contract, is false.
The intention to enter into a contract is generally determined by the objective standard, which assesses how a reasonable person would view the intentions based on the outward expressions of the parties, rather than their internal, subjective intentions. This is important in contract law as it allows courts to assess contractual agreements and enforce them more consistently.
The other questions pertain to historical aspects of the United States Constitution. The statement about the necessary and proper clause is false; in fact, it has been interpreted to expand the powers of the national government.
Concerning the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the statement that it met for the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation is true. The convention's actual outcome went beyond revision and ultimately led to the replacement of the Articles with the new Constitution.