Question

V3 was a successful singing group that contracted to perform at the "Metalsubstance" rock concert. V3 was aware that the promoter would sustain a substantial loss if the group failed to perform. The members of the group were stricken with a virus that confined them to their beds. The promoter sued for breach of contract. What is the probable result?

A. The promoter wins, and V3 must pay compensatory damages.
B. V3 wins, as illness is a valid excuse for non-performance.
C. It depends on the terms of the contract.
D. V3 is responsible for the loss sustained by the promoter.

Answer 1

The probable result depends on the terms of the contract between V3 and the promoter. If the contract includes a force majeure clause, V3 may have a valid defense due to illness. However, if the contract does not address illness or provide for contingencies, the promoter may be entitled to compensatory damages.

Step-by-step explanation:

The probable result of the lawsuit depends on the terms of the contract between V3 and the promoter. In general, illness may be considered a valid excuse for non-performance, but it ultimately depends on how the contract addresses such situations.

If the contract includes a force majeure clause, which typically covers unforeseen circumstances beyond a party's control, such as illness, V3 may have a valid defense.

However, if the contract does not specifically address illness or provide for any contingencies, the promoter may argue that V3 breached the contract and may be entitled to compensatory damages.

correct D) .V3 is responsible for the loss sustained by the promoter.