Question

The judicial doctrine 'business purpose' can decrease the taxpayer's ability to employ effective planning techniques.

a. True.
b. False.

Answer 1

The court case that extended the rights from Morrissey v. Brewer to probationers is Bearden v. Georgia. In 1983, the Supreme Court ruled in Bearden v. Georgia that probation cannot be revoked solely because a probationer is unable to pay fines or restitution, unless the failure to pay is willful. d) Bearden v. Georgia

Step-by-step explanation:

The court case that extended the rights from Morrissey v. Brewer to probationers is Bearden v. Georgia.

In 1983, the Supreme Court decided the case of Bearden v. Georgia, which extended the rights established in Morrissey v. Brewer to probationers. The Morrissey case held that probationers are entitled to certain due process rights, such as the right to notice and a hearing before revocation of probation. In Bearden v. Georgia, the Court ruled that probation cannot be revoked solely because a probationer is unable to pay fines or restitution, unless the failure to pay is willful.

This case recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection and due process clauses prohibit imposing punishment on an indigent probationer solely because of their inability to pay. The Court held that before revoking probation, there must be a determination that the probationer was willful in their failure to pay and had the ability to pay. This ruling ensures that probationers are not unduly burdened by their financial circumstances and protects their rights in the criminal justice system.

Keywords: Bearden v. Georgia, Morrissey v. Brewer, probationers, due process rights, Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection, fines, restitution, revoking probation.