Final answer:
The Supreme Court case INS v. Lopez-Mendoza held that deportation is a civil proceeding and does not offer the same constitutional protections as criminal cases, which has significant implications for the rights of those facing deportation. d) INS v. Lopez-Mendoza
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "Held that deportation was a civil, rather than criminal sanction" refers to the landmark Supreme Court case of INS v. Lopez-Mendoza. In this case, the Supreme Court determined that deportation is a civil proceeding and not a criminal one.
Therefore, the constitutional protections typically afforded to criminal defendants are not necessarily applied in the same manner to deportation proceedings. This ruling maintains a clear distinction between civil and criminal law, emphasizing that civil cases do not offer the same level of constitutional protections as criminal cases do.
The decision has far-reaching implications, influencing how deportation is seen in the context of the law and affecting the rights of those involved in deportation processes.