Question

"In 2005, the Court held in United States v. Booker that federal judges no longer were required to follow the _______ that had been in effect since 1987."

a) Indeterminate sentencing

b) Mandatory minimum sentencing

c) Determinate sentencing

d) Presumptive sentencing guidelines

Answer 1

In 2005, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Booker that federal judges were no longer required to follow the presumptive sentencing guidelines.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is d) Presumptive sentencing guidelines. In 2005, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Booker that federal judges were no longer required to follow the presumptive sentencing guidelines that had been in effect since 1987. This means that judges now have more discretion in determining appropriate sentences for federal crimes.