Final answer:
The claim that juveniles are not afforded Miranda rights in most jurisdictions is false. Juveniles have the same constitutional protections under Miranda v. Arizona, which requires law enforcement to provide Miranda warnings to protect against self-incrimination.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'Most jurisdictions do not afford Miranda rights to juveniles' is false. Juveniles are generally afforded Miranda rights just as adults are. This comes from the landmark case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which highlighted the necessity of procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. The court's decision implies that the rights to remain silent, to consult with a lawyer, and to have a lawyer appointed if indigent are fundamental and must be communicated to individuals in custody, including juveniles as established in subsequent cases like In re Gault (1967).
The significance of the Miranda Warning is to ensure an accused person's statements during police interrogation are voluntary and not the result of coercion. The warning aims to protect individuals' Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel. The societal implications involve balancing the due process rights of the accused with the rights of crime victims and maintaining the integrity of the legal system.