Final answer:
The provided exercises cover topics such as the effect of the necessary and proper clause, colonists' views on taxation, responsibilities in proprietary colonies, Jefferson's economic strategies, and the market revolution. The statements are respectively false, true, false, false, and true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Addressing the provided exercises:
The necessary and proper clause is often interpreted as having expanded the power of the national government, not limited it. Therefore, the statement "The necessary and proper clause has had the effect of limiting the power of the national government" is false.
The colonists did have concerns about taxation without representation, meaning their objection stemmed from how the tax money would be applied and the lack of their involvement in the decision-making process. This means the statement "The colonists did not necessarily object to the principle of taxation, but rather how the tax money would be applied" is true.
In a proprietary colony, while profit was a goal, the Proprietors had obligations such as maintaining the colony and managing its affairs. Therefore, the statement "In a proprietary colony, the Proprietors have no responsibilities except to collect the profits" is false.
Jefferson’s Embargo Act of 1807 was intended to apply economic pressure on Britain and France but ultimately had negative effects on the US economy and was not successful in its goals. Thus, the statement "Jefferson's efforts to use economic pressure to solve the situation with Britain and France were successful" is false.
The market revolution in the United States indeed brought many social and economic changes, including the expansion of markets and changes in transport and industrialization. Thus, the statement "The market revolution brought many social and economic changes to the United States" is true.