Final answer:
Persons with severe mental disorders who commit crimes are most likely to be arrested for property crimes or drug offenses, with property crimes being the most common. These include nonviolent offenses, distinguishing them from violent crimes and white-collar crimes. Disparities in imprisonment for different crimes, such as drug offenses, result partly from social attitudes and the criminal justice system's response.
Step-by-step explanation:
Persons with severe mental disorder who commit crimes are most likely to be arrested for Property crimes. This category includes offenses like larceny, car theft, and vandalism and does not involve the use of force or threat of force. Drug offenses could also be common among individuals with severe mental disorders due to various factors, including attempts to self-medicate. However, Violent crimes, such as ra-pe and murder, and White-collar crimes, such as embezzlement and insider trading, are less likely compared to property crimes and drug-related offenses.
According to the social disorganization theory, crime is most likely to occur in a community where neighbors do not know each other very well.
Disparities in imprisonment, including those due to identity factors like racial profiling by police officers, can affect the likelihood of arrest and conviction for different groups.
Corporate crime is exemplified by embezzlement, which differs from street crimes committed against persons or property.
Certainly, the disparities in law enforcement’s response to different types of crime can influence who gets arrested and for what. For example, the crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparities indicate a level of inequality within the criminal justice system.
Political prisoners have historically found themselves incarcerated under systems like the Russian katorga, alongside criminals.
The crime trends in the United States have seen violent crimes decrease while nonviolent crimes persist at varying levels.
Spousal abuse is a type of violent crime and illustrates personal harm as opposed to crimes against property or corporate interests.
The prevalence of crack cocaine in certain communities and the stringent laws such as "three strikes laws" that followed, demonstrate the societal reaction to drug-related crime and the impact of these reactions on sentencing and incarceration rates.