41.5k views
2 votes
Which of the following findings indicate that indirect calorimetry data may be unacceptable?

a) Stable respiratory quotient
b) Consistent metabolic rate
c) Elevated oxygen consumption
d) Variation in respiratory exchange ratio

User BlakeTNC
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Variation in the respiratory exchange ratio is an indicator of potentially unacceptable indirect calorimetry data. This is because stable and consistent respiratory measurements suggest accurate and reliable data, while fluctuations may point to inaccuracies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Indirect calorimetry is a method used to estimate a person's metabolic rate by measuring the oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Since this method is reliant on gas exchange, it's important that the data obtained are reliable. The respiratory quotient (RQ) is the ratio of carbon dioxide produced to oxygen consumed, and it provides information on the sources of energy being utilized by the body. For example, an RQ of 1 would suggest a carbohydrate metabolism as 1 mole of carbon dioxide is produced for every mole of oxygen consumed when glucose is utilized.

The measurement of energy expenditure through indirect calorimetry is accurate when the respiratory patterns are consistent. However, if there is variation in the respiratory exchange ratio (RQ), this may suggest that the data are not reliable. Additionally, stable and consistent readings such as a stable respiratory quotient and consistent metabolic rate are indicators of good measurements. In contrast, an elevated oxygen consumption or significant variation in the RQ could indicate methodological problems or biological factors that may affect the accuracy of the data.

User Salman Kazmi
by
8.1k points